{"id":268,"date":"2007-03-12T12:51:53","date_gmt":"2007-03-12T19:51:53","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2007-03-26T01:02:05","modified_gmt":"2007-03-26T05:02:05","slug":"the_sxsw_web_awards_what_s_the_point","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/2007\/the_sxsw_web_awards_what_s_the_point\/","title":{"rendered":"The SXSW Web Awards: What&#8217;s the Point?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"juiz-outdated-message jodpm-top\">Heads up, this content is 19 years old. Please keep its age in mind while reading.<\/div><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/2007.sxsw.com\/img\/wa_icon07v3.jpg\" align=\"right\" hspace=\"10\" \/>I was embarrassed for our industry last night.  Maybe it was because I hadn&#8217;t dressed up pretty or researched Ze Frank, the emcee, in advance.  I wasn&#8217;t pre-psyched-up when I walked into the room, and that, surely, had something to do with my attitude.  So with that disclaimer in place, let me now announce my obnoxious opinion: <strong>The SXSW 10th Annual Web Awards sucked.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the thing.  There were more new cool websites created in the last year than you, or me, or any self-respecting techie had a chance to check out.  Moreover, we&#8217;re in such a super-saturated atmosphere of self-promoting competition that even if we did check them out, chances are we didn&#8217;t get too involved with them.  They were made for the public, the teens, the families, the businessfolk, the non-techies.  Not for us.  Well, okay, a few were made for us.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.twitter.com\">Twitter<\/a>, for example.  And we cheered for those.  Sort of.  More accurately, we laughed at them and at ourselves,  because let&#8217;s face it, this industry is pretty absurd.  And if nothing else, that was the point that was made last night.<\/p>\n<p>Ze Frank was funny &#8212; I&#8217;ll give him that.  But he was also sarcastic and negative, and he had to <em>remind<\/em> us to clap.  Repeatedly.  It was obvious that he didn&#8217;t know who most of the finalists were, and he found numerous ways to make fun of our geek culture&#8230; but the pathetic part was that <em>he was right on.<\/em>  By the lack of applause and enthusiasm in the room, you knew that most of us didn&#8217;t know who most of the finalists were, either; we were providing great material for his industry-deprecating comments.  <strong>A quick two-line mission statement of each finalist would have gotten us involved in the competitive aspect,<\/strong> but instead we were just given names (see my NameDropping 2.0 post&#8230; I&#8217;ve got lots more to say on this issue).<\/p>\n<p>To top it off, the whole thing felt entirely arbitrary.  We heard nothing about the qualifications of the judges (except that they purportedly &#8220;have no friends&#8221;) or what criteria the winners were chosen on.  No one talked about the process, the purpose, or the point.<\/p>\n<p><strong>We&#8217;re not Hollywood.<\/strong>  We don&#8217;t have a cohesive industry that viscerally experiences the breadth of our colleagues creations.  We&#8217;re not glamourous; we&#8217;re geeks.  We get excited about what&#8217;s been built for <em>us<\/em>, and we like to talk about how we&#8217;re changing the world.  Panel discussions inspire us and parties connect us, but hollywoood-style awards just make us look lame.<\/p>\n<p>I appreciate the gesture &#8212; we&#8217;re banning together as an industry and putting forth our standards for excellence by recognizing our successful members.  This goal is important, and I&#8217;m not knocking it.  But let&#8217;s embrace our culture and develop an awards ceremony that works for us.  One in which we can be positive and excited &#8212; not one in which we realize how amazingly pathetic we look in direct comparison to the Oscars.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Heads up, this content is 19 years old. Please keep its age in mind while reading.I was embarrassed for our industry last night. Maybe it was because I hadn&#8217;t dressed up pretty or researched Ze Frank, the emcee, in advance. I wasn&#8217;t pre-psyched-up when I walked into the room, and that, surely, had something to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-web_20"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahdopp.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}