Heads up, this content is 17 years old. Please keep its age in mind while reading.
Translation: “It’s Not Going to Be What You Want it To Be”
- generally
- prospectively
- in essence
- ideally
- basically
- potentially
- probably
- technically
- categorically
- in theory
- sort of
Translation: “It’s Not Going to Happen The Way You Want it to Happen”
- straightforward
- easy
- automatically
- at some point
- ultimately
- try
Translation: “Do it Yourself.”
Posted in Business, Management, Marketing, Philosophy | 2 Comments » | August 31st, 2007
Heads up, this content is 17 years old. Please keep its age in mind while reading.
Quick Recap: In my last post, I showed a livejournal error message that referenced the words “style” and “fashion.” For me, it posed the question, “Could this be a subliminal branding technique used to appeal to cutting-edge user groups?” Fortunately, Jenks pulled me off my overly-theoretical soapbox by responding with a healthy degree of skepticism:
“unless the fashion tips came with instructions that people who spend more time with vogue than with code could understand, it’s doubtful.”
I have a great deal of respect for this woman and her work as an expert on identity marketing. I also happen to not be an expert on identity marketing, which means I would now be stepping way out of line if I were to pursue this argument.
But that’s never stopped me before.
Here’s my point: I don’t think we’re talking about fashion tips here — I think what we’re seeing is boring technodribble presented in language that’s familiar to a hip crowd. It’s a subtle way of acknowledging that their users aren’t all geeks, and tipping their hats to the voguers.
Do I think Livejournal did this on purpose? No (although, if they did, someone please let me know). Do I think we should learn a lesson from the coincidence? Yes. What’s the lesson? There are plenty of ways that we can communicate to our users, “We are one of you; we speak your language.” Plenty.
Let’s break these down into three levels: the big ways, the basic ways, and the subtle ways. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in branding, Web 2.0 | 3 Comments » | August 25th, 2007
Heads up, this content is 17 years old. Please keep its age in mind while reading.
Count the clothing references in this livejournal page load error:
Error running style: Style code didn't finish running in a timely fashion. Possible causes:
- Infinite loop in style or layer
Primary Question: How many do you see?
Silly Subquestion: Is this a subliminal branding technique to appeal to cutting-edge user groups?
Followup Question: Could it be?
Posted in Fun, Webmaster Stuff | 3 Comments » | August 24th, 2007